Fort Loudoun Winchester Virginia
Designed & built by Colonel George Washington
1756-1758
Also related events 1752-1764 before and after French & Indian War
The men in this Court Martial
This court trial led to the first hangings Washington authorized after obtaining the legal authority from Dinwiddie and it happened in Fort Loudoun Winchester VA
Each of the men in the jury and the guards bringing forth these prisoners have huge stories to tell.
A biography is offered on some of these men here.
These men were strong, tough, picked by George Washington for positions of leadership.
They were all Daniel Boone on steroids without a public relations agent.
General Court-Martial
See link for this trial for the footnotes giving more detail
[Fort Loudoun, 25–26 July 1757]
The Proceedings of a General-court-martial held at Fort Loudoun on the 25th & 26th Days of July 1757 by Vertue of a Commission directed to
Capt. Waggener M Capt. Lieut. McNeill
Lieut. Lomax e Lieut. Steenbergen
Lieut. Campbell m Ensn Roy
Ensn Russell b Ensn Speake
e
r
s
Lieut. Nathl Thompson Judge Advocate
After the President, Members & Judge Advocate had taken the Oaths directed by an Act of Assembly passed the 14th Day of April 1757.
Prisoner Ignatius Edwards an old Deserter from the Regiment & brought back as a Draught by Vertue of a late Act of Assembly confin’d by Ensn Speake for deserting since he last joined the Regiment was brought before the Court.
After the Prisoner had been informed for what Offence he was confin’d & brought to Tryal & had heard the Nature of his Offence again explain’d, and the Act of Assembly relative thereto read—He was asked by the Judge Advocate whether he was guilty of the Crime he was accused of or not guilty? he answered—Guilty.
When he had plead guilty he was asked whether he had met with any such rigorous Treatment in the Service (or from what he had seen & known had Reason to dread he wou’d) as to induce him to desert? He answer’d NO.
He was then asked what had induced him to be guilty of so heinous a Crime the Penalties of which he had been often told & perticularly made well acquainted with when he last joined the Regiment & in the warmest Manner exhorted to avoid?
He answer’d he had heard the Articles against Desertion read but had not by any Exhortation or Command else as he cou’d recollect been advised or order’d to avoid the Penalties by Them inflicted.
Colo. George Washington (being sworn) declared that he exhorted the Draughts in general to act well & told them that by a good Behavior they wou’d not only prevent Punishments & harsh Treatment, but make him
& the rest of the Officers do every Thing in their Power to render the Service agreeable
& that after he had in general spoke to all the Draughts then present he addressed himself to the Prisoner in perticular & told him that (as he had already been twice pardoned for the villanous
& shameful Crime of Desertion) he ought for the future to be perticularly careful of his Behavior & never more think of deserting for that shou’d he desert again
& be apprehended Nothing cou’d prevent his being hanged—
He likewise declares that an Offer was made him from the Prisoner and William Brent in his behalf that he (the Prisoner) for a Discharge wou’d procure a Man to serve in his Room
& that he (the Colo.) told them that as he had been an old Offender he wou’d not for any Consideration discharge him.
Capt. Robt Steuart being sworn declares that he heard Colo. Washington speak to the Draughts & the Prisoner in perticular as above or in Words to the same Effect.
The Prisoner Ignatius Edwards says in his Defence that he deserted with an Intent to hire two Men to come in his Stead.
(NOTE: IGNATIUS EDWARDS MIGHT HAVE A LEGAL DEFENSE:
The law of 1755 had orginally allowed for this paying for a replacement and this law was still in effect when Ignatius Edwards said he hired men to take his place. See footnote 4 of this link : "A draftee would be excused from serving, however, if he found another man to take his place or if he paid a fine of £10 at once. Dinwiddie later reported that nearly all of the recruits were volunteers and that it was because a man drafted could pay £10 and not serve that there were fewer than 400 recruits rather than the 1,500 hoped for...")
( NOTE: IGNATIUS EDWARDS MIGHT HAVE FURTHER LEGAL DEFENSE:
Scroll down to page 15 of this link of the March 1756 law, to see this quote that actually makes Ignatius Edwards defense a legally valid defense: "...unless such person shall immediately pay down to the chief officer, present at such council of war, the sum of ten pounds (to be by such chief officer paid to any person, or persons, who shall enter into his majesty's service, in the room of such person who shall pay the same, and in case no person will accept of the same, upon those terms, then to be by such chief officer accounted for, and paid to the treasurer of this colony, and by him to be applied to the same uses as the taxes laid and imposed by this act, are directed to be applied) or shall immediately procure some other able-bodied person to serve as a soldier in his stead; and the person, or persons, who shall draw out of the said box, any of the said blank papers, shall be discharged from being drafted out of the militia of such county, city, or borough, to serve as a soldier, and such person and persons, so drafted and inlisted, in the manner aforesaid, and failing to pay down the said sum of ten pounds, or to procure some other able-bodied person to serve in his stead,...")
He was then told that he must be certain that no Pretence of that Kind wou’d be admitted as an Excuse for the Colo. himself had before he deserted told him that he wou’d not take Men in his Room.
The Prisoner then was asked whether he had any Thing else to offer in his Defence which might diminish the horrid Nature of his Offence or make it appear in a more favourable View to the Court: He answer’d NO.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the above Prisoner Ignatius Edwards shall suffer Death by being hanged or shot.
(NOTE: This was a 2 day trial. Although not stated in this transcript, the first day was probably centered on just this one accused deserter, Ignatius Edwards. This is the only accused on which the court spent most of its time, most of its questions, and most of its research. The court was apparently more concerned about this one man since depositions were taken to defend the court's decision even after Ignatius Edwards was hanged. )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prisoners Joshua King & George Curtis Soldiers draughted by a Late Act of Assembly confin’d by Adjutant Hughs for Desertion were brought before the Court.
The Prisoners (after the Nature of their Offences were explain’d & the Act of Assembly relative thereto read) were by the Judge Advocate asked whether they were guilty or not guilty of the Crime they were accused of? answer’d Guilty.
Upon their being asked whether their Treatment in the Service cou’d induce them to be guilty of so horrid an Offence they answer’d NO.
They were then asked whether they did not know that they were liable for such an Offence to suffer Death? they answer’d Yes.
Being then asked what cou’d induce them to become liable to such a Penalty? they answer’d the great Desire that they had to be at Home with their Friends.
They were then asked wheather they had any Thing to offer in their Favour that cou’d alleviate their Crime they answer’d NO, only that they beged the Clemency of the Court.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the above Prisoners Joshua King & George Curtis shall suffer Death by being hanged or shot.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Prisoners Thomas Short a Soldier draughted by a late Act of Assembly, confin’d by Ensn Speake for Desertion was brought before the Court.
The Prisoner (being inform’d for what he was brought before the Court, the Nature of his Offence being explained &c.) being asked wheather he was guilty or not guilty of the Crime that he was accused of answered Guilty.
He was then asked wheather he was not sensible that the Penalty was Death answer’d Yes but that he was induced thereto by William Beatly who deserted with him & is not yet taken.
Being asked wheather he had any Thing farther to say that wou’d render his Case favourable he answer’d No, I have not any.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the above Prisoner Thomas Short shall suffer Death by being hanged or Shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Felts James Butler Samuel Pate & Thomas Pate Soldiers draughted by a late Act of Assembly confind by Adjutant Hughs for Desertion were brought before the Court.
After, they were informed for what Offence they appear’d before the Court & the Nature of it explained &c., the same Questions were put to them that were put to the former Prisoner all which were answered in the same Manner with this Difference only that they were persuaded to desert by John Johnson—
It is the Sentence of the Court that the Prisoners Aaron Felts, James Butler, Samuel Pate & Thomas Pate shall suffer Death by being hanged or shot.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prisoners Stephen Lathrum of Lieut. Colo. Stephen’s Company confin’d by Ensn Starke for Desertion was brought before the Court.
After the Prisoner was told for what he appeared before the Court & the Nature of his Offence explained &c. he was asked the same Questions of the last that were tryed—all which he answer’d in the same Manner, only with this Difference viz. that he was not by any one induced to desert nor wou’d have done it was he to have been continued in the Country but that he did not care go to to South Carolina—
This to be observed that this is not the first Time that the Prisoner has been guilty of, & tryed for, the same Offence.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the Prisoner Stephen Lathrum shall be shot.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Fisher Jacob Rowell Joseph Hughs Soldiers draughted by a late Act of Assembly, confin’d by Ensn Crawford for Desertion were brought before the Court.
The Prisoners, after they were informed for what they appeared before the Court & the Nature of their Offence was explained &c., plead (upon being asked wheather they were Guilty or not Guilty) Guilty And in their Defence say that they had never received the Bounty Mony nor heard the Articles of War read & that Colo. Paramour of Accomack County told them when they were draughted that they might desert with Impunity after they were delivered to the military Officers at Fredericksburgh.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the above Prisoners John Fisher, Jacob Rowell and Joseph Hughs shall each of them receive fifteen hundred Lashes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prisoners Richard Smith Hezekiah Ventris James Cooper & William Peyton Soldiers draughted by a late Act of Assembly confin’d by Ensn Crawford were brought before the Court.
The Prisoners (,after they were inform’d for what they appeared before the Court & the Nature of their Offence was explain’d, &c. upon being asked wheather they were guilty or not guilty) answered Guilty & in their Defence say that they had never received the Bounty Mony, took the Oaths or heard the Articles of War read & that they were induced to desert by James Fitzpatrick an old Soldier who told them that if they knew as much as he did they wou’d sooner cut their own Throats than come to Winchester.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the Prisoners Richard Smith, Hezekiah Ventris, James Cooper & William Peyton shall receive each one thousand Lashes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Thomson Henry Thomson Richard Morgan Joshua Bridge Soldiers draughted by a late Act of Assembly, confin’d by Ensn Speake for Desertion were brought before the Court.
The Prisoners (after the Nature of their Offences were explain’d & the Act of Assembly relative thereto read &c.) were by the Judge Advocate asked wheather they were guilty or not guilty of the Crime they were accused of? They answer’d Guilty. After which they were questioned in the same Manner as Joshua King & George Curtis had been to which Questions they answer’d in the same Manner as they had done with this difference only viz. that they were persuaded to desert by William Driver who deserted with them & is not yet taken. The Prisoners beg the Clemency of the Court.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the Prisoners Charles Thomson, Henry Thomson, Richard Morgan & Joshua Bridge shall suffer Death by being hanged or Shot.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prisoners LeRoy Bryant a Soldier draughted by a late Act of Assembly, confin’d by Lieut. Baker for Desertion was brought before the Court.
The Prisoner (after the Nature of his Offence was explained &c.) was asked wheather he was guilty or not guilty. He answer’d Guilty, but in his Defense says that he intended to come back & that he had never been attested.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the above Prisoner LeRoy Bryant shall receive fifteen hundred Lashes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Smith a Soldier draughted by a late Act of Assembly, confin’d by Lieut. Crawford for Desertion was brought before the Court.
The Prisoner (after the Nature of his Offence was explain’d & the Act of Assembly relative thereto read &c.) was by the Judge Advocate asked wheather he was guilty or not guilty of the Crime that he was accused of & he answer’d Guilty.
He was then asked the same Questions that had been put to Joshua King & George Curtis all which he answer’d in the same Manner that they had done with this Defference only viz. that he had deserted with an Intent to procure a Man to come in his Room.
It is the Sentence of the Court that the Prisoner William Smith shall suffer Death by hanging.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the Opinion of the Court that the Tryal of William Steuart Packett be defered,5 ’till Evidences can be had from the South Branch every one being there that were Witnesses of his Misbehavior.
The following jurors were put up for promotion 12 June 1757 - Peter Steenburgen, Capt. Lt Jno. McNeil, John Campbell, John Edwd Lomax, James Roy Nathanl Thompson, Henry Russell.
One of the guards of the prisoners, Wm Crawford whose wild biography appears below was also on this promotion list.
Many of the men in this list also signed a letter recommending George Speake to become an ensign in a letter to Washington 5 November 1756
Interesting letter 10 March 1758 regarding some men wishing to leave regiment formally instead of deserting and George Speake was the letter carrier
George Speake, subaltern in the Va. Regt. entitled to 2000 acres of land
agreeable to King's Proc. of 1763. Williamsburg, Apr. 21, 1774. Dunmore
Major Andrew Lewis
He was at Fort Necessity when Washington was forced to surrender to the French in 1754
See rolls listing many of these jurors at this Battle of the Meadows from returns listed at Wills Creek July 9, 1754
And "returns" of companies July 12, 1756.
See list of letters from Washington to Andrew Lewis
On February 18, 1756, the Big Sandy expedition, commanded Lewis left Fort Frederick with a mixed force of militiamen and Cherokee allies to raid the enemy Shawnee towns along the Big Sandy and Ohio rivers in retaliation for Shawnee attacks
As part of the Forbes Expedition, he joined in Major James Grant's attack on Fort Duquesne, and was captured in September 1758. Lewis was taken to Quebec and held as a prisoner until his release late in 1759
In 1774, Dunmore's War broke out against the Shawnees. Governor Dunmore led a force from Fort Pitt into the Ohio Country. Lewis, now promoted to colonel, led a second force by the southern route.
Lewis was attacked by the Shawnee Chief Cornstalk when he was camped at the Ohio River crossing at Point Pleasant. His victory in the Battle of Point Pleasant on October 10, 1774, secured his military reputation.
Because of that victory and association with Lord Dunmore, it seems Lewis now a Colonel was passed over promotion because some thought he let Dunmore escape during the War for Independence.
--------------------------------------CAPTAIN
THOMAS WAGGENER
LOTS OF LINKS
He was at Fort Necessity when Washington was forced to surrender to the French in 1754. Waggener's brother died later on the Braddock's debacle on the Monongahela River.
All letters between Washington and Waggener.
Waggener directed to build Fort Pleasant (Waggener's Lower Fort)
Waggener directed to build
Waggener was accused of cowardice by not helping in the Battle of the Trought. He was accused not by court martial but informally by some men, who hunted down and had whipped for suggesting such an accusation.
Lomax was the other juror also charged with cowardice in The Battle of the Great Cacapon in the formal setting of a court martial.
CAPTAIN
THOMAS WAGGENER --------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------LIEUTENANT JOHN LOMAX
THE COURT MARTIAL on May 2, 1756 in Winchester exonerated Lieutenant John Lomax from the charge of cowardice in the Battle of the Great Cacapon
Another man, was not so lucky. That man, Sergeant Nathan Lewis, was charged with cowardice. See other Court Martial on the same date in Winchester. Notice Lomax sat as a juror on that trial. He was on both sides of the bench that day, May 2, 1756.
Fort Loudoun was just starting construction in May 1756 so both court martial trials were datelined "Winchester" and not "Fort Loudoun" as the trial discussed on this page was.
Lomax was juror on another court martial May 18, 1756 in Winchester VA
Journal of Capt Charles Lewis October 10 to December 10, 1755. Do a Ctrl F to find Lomax and you will see in this 1755 he was listed as a Lieutenant then. See journal.
---------------------------------
ENSIGN OR LIEUTENANT
WILLIAM CRAWFORD
THERE IS AN ENSIGN CRAWFORD AND LIEUTENANT CRAWFORD REFERENCED IN THIS COURT MARTIAL.
IN A LETTER WASHINGTON WRITES TO CRAWFORD IN LINK BELOW, WASHINGTON ADDRESSES AN ENSIGN CRAWFORD TO CAPTURE WILLIAM SMITH, THE MAN ACCUSED OF DESERTION AND SENTENCED TO HANG BY THIS COURT MARTIAL.
BUT IT IS A LIEUTENANT CRAWFORD WHO BRINGS FORTH THAT WILLIAM SMITH.
SO IT WOULD SEEM BOTH ENSIGN AND LIEUTENANT MIGHT BE THE SAME CRAWFORD
SEE LETTER 20 JULY 1757 FROM COL GEORGE WASHINGTON
BUTTERFIELD COLLECTION OF LETTERS FROM 1767 - 1781
SEE ALL LETTERS BETWEEN GEORGE WASHINGTON AND WILLIAM CRAWFORD - LETTERS
YEARS LATER THIS ENSIGN WILLIAM CRAWFORD LATER BECOMES COLONEL CRAWFORD AND DIES A HORRIBLE HORRIBLE DEATH
SEE ALL LINKS REGARDING THE BURNING AT THE STAKE DEATH OF WILLIAM CRAWFORD IN 1782
SEARCH FOR THE BURN SITE
WILLIAM CRAWFORD BURN SITE MONUMENT
HISTORICAL MARKERS ALONG THE CRAWFORD EXPEDITION
SEE LINKS ON STORY OF SIMON GIRTY WHO WITNESS THE BURNING AT THE STAKE OF WILLIAM CRAWFORD
XXX
ENSIGN OR LIEUTENANT
WILLIAM CRAWFORD
------------------------------------
Lt John Campbell discription in Orders, 12 July 1756
Robert McKenzie’s company: John Campbell, enl. in Talbot County, Md., 34, 5′6″, Scottish, “speaks broad”;
And was this the same John Campbell years later who sold his white horse to Washingon when Washington was President?
See letter From George Washington to John Campbell, 31 May 1789