Two letters - 27 Dec 1756 and 31 Dec 1756
There are 2 letters by the two of the most powerful people in Virginia
writing to our Colonel George Washington
on those 2 dates noted above.
.
We are struck by the strength of a 24 year old man to command
an earnest response
from Lt Gov Dinwiddie and
House of Burgesses Speaker Robinson.
.
Granted, the correspondence between GW and men of high authority has been going on since 1753 at least and even before. When GW left Bermuda, he has a meeting with Dinwiddie in January 30, 1752.
.
These two men occupy the most powerful of political offices in Virginia -
the Lt Governor and
.
Dwell for a moment on this young man before going to the 2 letters from those 2 powerful political leaders.
A Young Colonel George Washington?
Calling him young can be somewhat misleading.
.
Sure, he is 24 years old. But look what he's seen?
.
Young.
There's a plaque on the 1840 Courthouse (now a Civil War museum) in Winchester VA that mentions the word twice.
.
But we’ve seen the WWII movies where someone is called “Pops.”
And that "Pops"
was really only in his 20s.
The late Norman Baker, a historian for the French and Indian War Foundation, mentions this.
And he knows.
He was on Iwo Jima.
Anyone who was a year or two
in war, or
who had been
in real battle
once or twice
got the veteran tag,
the “look”,
the knowledge …
.
.
And sometimes that look was called the 1000 yard stare, as in this picture by Tom Lea.
.
So too was George Washington a veteran.
.
He was 24, but he saw a lot.
.
They didn't call him Pops
and maybe he didn't have the 1000 yard stare.
.
.
Having seen how things
can really, really
go wrong
on a long journey to & back
where he almost dies twice
from an Indian shooting at him
and from falling in the ice river . . .
or in victory (the Battle of Jumonville)
or in defeat (Fort Necessity July 3, 1754)
or in major horror ( Braddock’s Defeat July 9, 1755),
you saw “experience” in a man, a tall leader, a veteran.
.
.
.
And now to those 2 letters.
.
27 Dec 1756 letter from Dinwiddie
.
.
In this 27 Dec 1756 letter to Colonel GW, Lt Gov Dinwiddie defends his decision about ordering 100 men from Fort Loudoun to go to Fort Cumberland. This decision was based on Capt George Mercer's reports of the numbers of soldiers there. Apparently these numbers were wrong or outdated. Colonel George Washington must not have known Mercer's report had wrong or outdated numbers, because GW was really shocked by Lt Gov Dinwiddie's order.
.
Overall there is a legitimate effort by Dinwiddie to explain himself here. Yet there is some duplicity by Dinwiddie suggests Founders Online.
.
How much did Lord Loudoun want Fort Cumberland garrisoned by Virginia? How much did Dinwiddie anticipate Lord Loudoun's wishes concerning Fort Cumberland? That's the question here.
.
We know GW did not want to garrison Fort Cumberland. It was an island Alamo surrounded by raiding parties. There were mountains looking over it for easy sniper fire. It was isolated from communications. Mail and Supplies always needed armed escort. This fort was only defending itself. It was not defending any homesteads nearby really. And then of course there was the Maryland commander Dagworthy insisting his expired British Captain commission outranks a provincial Virginia Colonel (George Washington) and a provincial Virginia Lt Colonel (Adam Stephen).
.
.
And garrisoning Fort Cumberland wasn't the only controversy.
.
Dr Thomas Walker was who Lt Gov Dinwiddie wanted to be Commissary. GW thought the man had too many other activities to focus his attention. Also Dr Walker's home was much further away from the theatre of operations of the Virginia Regiment.
.
.
.
.
.
In this letter of 31 Dec 1756, the Speaker of the House of Burgesses, John Robinson Jr, commiserates with Col George Washington's concerns about leaving Fort Loudoun with too little to guard its stores.
.
You must marvel at this Universe before Twitter.
.
You will notice this is all one long sentence:
.
I am truly concerned at the uneasiness you are under in your present Situation, and the more so, as I am sensible you have too much reason for it, The Resolution of defending Fort Cumberland and evacuating the other Forts was taken before I knew or mistrusted (this word mistrusted is really a synonym for the word "suspected") any thing of the Matter, I must confess I was not a little surprised at it, and took the Liberty to expostulate with many of the Council upon it, who gave me for Answer that Lord Loudon had insisted that Fort Cumberland should be preserved at all Events, and as we had so few Troops, it could not be done without breaking up the small Forts and taking the men from them it was to no Purpose to tell them that our Frontiers would thereby be intirely exposed to our Cruel and Savage Enemy, and that they could receive no Protection from Fort Cumberland, as it was in another Province, and so remote from any of our Inhabitants, and further that by such a Conduct the Act of Assembly which gave the Money solely for the Defence and Protection of our Frontiers would be violated and the Money applied otherwise than the Assembly intended, yet notwithstanding all I could say they persisted in their Resolution without alledging any other reason for it, than that it was in pursuance of Lord Loudon’s desire, it cant be any difficult matter to Guess who was the Author and Promoter of this Advice and Resolution, or by whom my Lord Loudon has been perswaded that the Place is of such Importance, but supposing it was realy so, surely it ought to be defended by the People in whose Province it is or least at the Expence of the three Colonies jointly, and not to leave our own Frontiers exposed for the defence of a Place from which we cant receive the least advantage or Protection, the present unhappy State of our Country must fill the Minds of every well wisher to it with dismal & gloomy Apprehensions, and without some speedy Alteration in our Counsels, which God sends, the Fate of it must soon be determined.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Some notes on
Garrisoning and Supplying
both Fort Cumberland vs Fort Loudoun -
.
.
GW's complaint 2 Dec 1756
.
.
.
Dinwiddie's first response 10 Dec 1756
.
.
.
More on wishing to retain Dr Walker as Commissary 15 Dec 1756
.
.
.
A Council and Gov meeting responding to Colonel GW's complaints
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Comments